Sorry about the confusing language. *blush* I've been trying to figure this out for the last few hours, and write it in a way not too mangled.
First, rejecting an idea as rational feels arbitrary. The WW is too derivative of the real world to reject things like deflation out of hand. It's not a wildly original, alien world like those created by Octavia Butler or Ursula K LeGuin. It doesn't escape the bonds of convention, so RL phenomena don't feel out of place for me.
Second, the WW canon responds only to JKR's ever-changing impulses, which are inconsistent, and not a system no matter how many encyclopedias there are. For example: magic can't bring back the dead, except with death's ring or priori incantatem or a horcrux or a horcrux removal AK. Except after interview retcon, then it's not really back from the dead, just looks like it. Portraits totally don't count as resurrecting a person, except there's never a glitch talking to them, unless you totally want to prove how not real they are. Wanna bring Snape or Lupin back from the dead? Good luck!
Without JKR's impulses, the WW can't be expanded. Not by its own authority. So fanon can either use reason to fill in the gaps or substitute anyones impulses. (Unless one person/group asserts their idiosyncrasies as a proxy authority for JKR over fandom. Fancoup.) Canon is governed by erratic authoritarianism, making all fanon subversive regardless of approach. This leaves neither rationality nor impulse with more authority than the other. In the light of this, "rational" isn't a convincing criticism.
no subject
First, rejecting an idea as rational feels arbitrary. The WW is too derivative of the real world to reject things like deflation out of hand. It's not a wildly original, alien world like those created by Octavia Butler or Ursula K LeGuin. It doesn't escape the bonds of convention, so RL phenomena don't feel out of place for me.
Second, the WW canon responds only to JKR's ever-changing impulses, which are inconsistent, and not a system no matter how many encyclopedias there are. For example: magic can't bring back the dead, except with death's ring or priori incantatem or a horcrux or a horcrux removal AK. Except after interview retcon, then it's not really back from the dead, just looks like it. Portraits totally don't count as resurrecting a person, except there's never a glitch talking to them, unless you totally want to prove how not real they are. Wanna bring Snape or Lupin back from the dead? Good luck!
Without JKR's impulses, the WW can't be expanded. Not by its own authority. So fanon can either use reason to fill in the gaps or substitute anyones impulses. (Unless one person/group asserts their idiosyncrasies as a proxy authority for JKR over fandom. Fancoup.) Canon is governed by erratic authoritarianism, making all fanon subversive regardless of approach. This leaves neither rationality nor impulse with more authority than the other. In the light of this, "rational" isn't a convincing criticism.